This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] person objects update
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] person objects update
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] person objects update
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pim van Pelt
pim at bit.nl
Wed Mar 17 10:21:18 CET 2004
Hi, | On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 04:33:57PM +0100, Pieterjan d'Hertog wrote: | > yes for shure but this doesn't help if you have a backlog and have to | > submit more than 100 person objects in one mail :-) | | You might want to consider using syncupdates. Create the person objects | from a script, and directly get the results back, without having to | send mail and parse responses. | | Way cool feature. Indeed!, and as of yet, totally unknown for me :) Sorry for being noob, but can you point me to the documentation that provides information on how to use such a direct communication with the ripedb, is it XML based, so that I can telnet into some server and interact directly with the software? Are many people using syncupdates ? I'm not entirely happy with email interaction (to put it mildly ;-) -- Met vriendelijke groet, BIT BV / Pim van Pelt PBVP1-RIPE
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] person objects update
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] person objects update
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]