This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Fri Jan 30 10:26:17 CET 2004
MarcoH wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:15:00AM +0100, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: > > >>Nowing that admin-c and tech-c seems to scale over the whole spectrum, >>it seems the most natural implementation to have abuse-c reference a >>(enhanced) person/role too. > > > 'remarks: complaints to abuse@' also seem to scale to >10% of the inetnum > objects. from am management level it seems so. But given the fact we are discussing it, it does not scale for the tool-writers. if i am wring, what is the discussion about? lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]