This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Rother
krd at gulu.net
Thu Jan 29 16:54:10 CET 2004
Hello. On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:48:48PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 29.01 12:42, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional > > attribute "abuse-c:". The value of the attribute is a nic-handle: > > which must refer to an extant person: or role: object. There may be > > zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object. > > I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role: > object. Because admin-c and tech-c are person or role objects, too, and not simple email addresses. Because person or role objects have phone and snailmail addresses. I strongly second the original proposal, please implement this asap! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040129/f906ac4e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]