[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:42:10PM +0100, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote:

> From the user's viewpoint yes, from the viewpoint of having to maintain 
> the objects, I'd prefer a reference, because if the mailbox changes, you 
> just have to maintain 1 Object and not n (for arbitrary positive 
> integers of n)

Therefore my proposal to also allow for it on the mntner object and
optionally modify the database server to return the maintainer when the
attribute is not present on the inetnum, but one of the maintainers
carries it.

Can somebody from Ripe give some insigth in how much work would be
involved on the various suggestions made, like adding attributes, complete
objects and or modifying the default behaviour of the server ?

MarcoH