[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:56:48PM +0000, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
>>>>  o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional
>>>>    attribute "abuse-c:".  The value of the attribute is a nic-handle:
>>>>    which must refer to an extant person: or role: object.  There may be
>>>>    zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object.
>>>
>>>I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role:
>>>object. Simple email address(es) would be imho just enough...
>>
>>i could live with that
> 
> 
> Same here.  Both would be fine.

 From the user's viewpoint yes, from the viewpoint of having to maintain 
the objects, I'd prefer a reference, because if the mailbox changes, you 
just have to maintain 1 Object and not n (for arbitrary positive 
integers of n)

Just my 0.02EUR
lG uk
-- 
Ulrich Kiermayr         Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien
Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT   Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT

eMail:      ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at       Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104
PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8                         Fax: (+43 1) 4277 /  9140