[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

I can also live with the value of the attribute being either a reference or a 
mailbox directly. In the latter case I suggest that the name should not end
on -c to prevent confusion.

In <20040112074509.GC2101 at arbeit.karrenberg.net> I wrote:

  > I am also in favour of adding the 'abuse-mailbox' attribute to the
  > maintainer object in order to provide a quick way for deployment that
  > does not involve changing a lot of inet*num objects.  The referencing
  > recommendation should be: "If the inet*num object for the address
  > concerned has an 'abuse-mailbox', use this address *only* for sending
  > abuse complaints.  If such an attribute is not present, check the
  > maintainer object for an 'abuse-mailbox' attribute and use this address
  > *only* for sending abuse complaints."

Would you consider including that in your proposal?

Daniel