This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Jan 29 13:59:50 CET 2004
At 12:56 PM 29-01-04 +0000, Randy Bush wrote: > >> o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional > >> attribute "abuse-c:". The value of the attribute is a nic-handle: > >> which must refer to an extant person: or role: object. There may be > >> zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object. > > I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role: > > object. Simple email address(es) would be imho just enough... > >i could live with that Ditto - makes no difference to me - whatever the consensus agrees on. -Hank >randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]