This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Thu Jan 29 13:48:48 CET 2004
On 29.01 12:42, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional > attribute "abuse-c:". The value of the attribute is a nic-handle: > which must refer to an extant person: or role: object. There may be > zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object. I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role: object. Simple email address(es) would be imho just enough... all the rest is OK for me. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]