[db-wg] abuse-c

On Jan 14, Christian Rasmussen <chr at jay.net> wrote:

 >Actually I kind of have the same need!.. :) But my idea would be to insert
 >our abuse address in the maintainer so it defaults to this one, and then
 >insert customer (more specific) abuse address in the inetnum.. The only
If the problem is lusers who cannot choose the right address to send
complaints to, then this is way too hard for them and is not a solution.
Looks like we need to discuss again the requirements...

 >> Extend mntner template with:
 >>
 >> abuse: [mandatory]  [multiple]
I think many people already explained why making this mandatory would
be too hard and not really useful.

 >Aside from my comments above I fully support this. Do we now have something
 >which a larger group could support??
I'm not sure. I think that so far nobody disagreed with the proposal to
return IRT objects by default for inetnum and inet6num queries, which
has the advantages of using what is already available and probably being
easy to implement.
OTOH, the RIPE DB people have not explained us yet if this is feasible.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [4094 coeYUCAGphQow]