[db-wg] abuse-c

Hi Christian,

* "Christian Rasmussen" <chr at jay.net> wrote:

> Okay, this was discussed yesterday and we talked about a combination
> of what Daniel Karrenberg suggested and the above, meaning you just
> add an optional abuse attribute to the inetnum objects, if its not
> added the abuse address will "default" to the abuse address of the
> maintainer object. Wouldn't this work for you?

Yes, of course, that would be pretty okay.
 
> Im not sure why it should be multiple? But I think most of us on this
> list can agree with you that a valid abuse email address associated
> with each inetnum in the database would be very welcome.


That's quite simple: I'd like to insert my customers abuse desk as well
as my own abuse desk to at least keep track of any incidents. 

regards,
sebastian

-- 
whois: sabt-ripe - phone: +49 (0)160 90759764  
email: sabt at sabt.net - pgp-pubkey: 0xD008DA9C