[db-wg] Re: abuse-c

So, we already have the irt object and the trouble attribute. Additionally,
abuse is often reported based on admin-c, tech-c, changed, remarks and
$DEITY knows what. Please let's not add to the confusion by creating even
more attribute or object types.

As for the irt object requiring a maintainer, that requirement exists for
security, the need for which should be obvious in the context of abuse
reports as well.

The obvious hardliner approach would be to require future inetnum updates to
carry valid mnt-irt attributes.

Thor

-- 
http://thorweb.anta.net/