[db-wg] abuse-c

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Christoph Mohr wrote:
> > The problem with person object is that the email field is optional, so I
> > don't see it as an option to refer to this object in abuse matters.
> 
> It should be forbidden to put in a person/role without email address as a
> tech-c or abuse-c. Or is there anybody out there who would to talk to a
> technical person by snail mail :-)

The last one "why is an email address not mandatory on person objects",
has been raised before and from what I remember making this mandatory
creates a race-condition in the initial setup when establishing a
registry. (registry is needed for the email to work -> email is required
working to create the registry).

Grtx,

MarcoH