This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Mon Jan 12 15:39:32 CET 2004
On Jan 12, MarcoH <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote: >If you define a abuse-c: as a person/role object, you still have the >problem that people need to resolve it and then possibly get multiple >addresses. So the problem doesn't get solved and we can just stick with >the irt-object. Not if the relevant IRT object is automatically returned for every inetnum query. This is what ARIN does, BTW. >I think for this we can better stick to the most simple solution >available. I think you should define better you requirements of simplicity... -- ciao, | Marco | [4046 bascZNOGgkZo2]
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]