[db-wg] abuse-c

Hi Adrian,


Im not sure if you have seen my previous mail, but I suggested to add a
field called "abuse-address" in the maintainer object and make a rule saying
Ripe NCC MUST check that the email address is correct by sending a mail to
it and not create the maintainer object until the mail has been responded.
MNT-BY is mandatory on inetnum objects so once all maintainer objects have
this field added all inetnum objects will be refering to a correct abuse
address without having each LIR to go through all inetnums.

The problem with person object is that the email field is optional, so I
don't see it as an option to refer to this object in abuse matters.



Med venlig hilsen/Best regards

Christian Rasmussen
Hosting manager, jay.net a/s

Smedeland 32, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark

Email: noc at jay.net
Personal email: chr at corp.jay.net
Tlf./Phone: +45 3336 6300, Fax: +45 3336 6301

Produkter / Products:
http://hosting.jay.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: db-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:db-wg-admin at ripe.net]On Behalf Of Rev
> Adrian Kennard
> Sent: 12. januar 2004 13:37
> To: db-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [db-wg] abuse-c
>
>
> Following up my own mail...
>
>  > Also, the "trouble" field is a good thought - maybe we should add
>  > "trouble" to inetnum, as there is already a field name defined for the
>  > purpose essentially. Just an idea.
>
> "trouble" is not really the answer as it is freeform. It needs to be a
> syntax checked email address. abuse-c to a person/role object seems
> sensible.
>
> --
> Rev Adrian Kennard
> Andrews & Arnold Ltd / AAISP  www.aaisp.net.uk
>
>
>