This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Rasmussen
chr at jay.net
Mon Jan 12 12:56:53 CET 2004
Why not simply add "abuse-address" as a MANDATORY attribute in the maintainer object, then Ripe NCC should have to check when creating a maintainer object that the address is valid (eg. send a mail to the address, Ripe NCC doesn't create the maintainer until their mail has been replied). It would be relatively simple for all LIRs to add such an attribute to their maintainer object and then for Ripe NCC to check up on those objects missing the attribute. The whois system would of course need to be modified to show the abuse-address attribute when doing a whois, but I don't believe that would be a big problem? After seeing the other comments Im not really sure I can see any reason for the complex authentication system implemented in the current irt object?! If the mantainer object is changed as described above Ripe NCC will send a mail to the abuse-address, if this is a third party (the LIR has outsourced abuse) then this organization will probably only accept Ripe NCC's mail in case they have actually made an agreement with the LIR trying to create the maintainer, if not they can report this to Ripe NCC. Med venlig hilsen/Best regards Christian Rasmussen Hosting manager, jay.net a/s Smedeland 32, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark Email: noc at jay.net Personal email: chr at corp.jay.net Tlf./Phone: +45 3336 6300, Fax: +45 3336 6301 Produkter / Products: http://hosting.jay.net > -----Original Message----- > From: db-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:db-wg-admin at ripe.net]On Behalf Of > Menno Pieters (Stelvio) > Sent: 12. januar 2004 12:23 > Cc: db-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [db-wg] abuse-c > > > TAYON, Julien wrote: > > John Green <mailto:j.green at ukerna.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > > >>I have never understood what this gives you. If "Evil Company" wants > >>to misdirect abuse reports (why?) they can circumvent this by making > >>a fake IRT object with IRT XYZ as the contact email address. > >> > > > > > > If people circumvent this they are either evil or incompetent which is > > alreday a strong hint to be suspicious. > > Moreover the process of creating an IRT object is controlled by the > RIPE-NCC, because it is like creating a maintainer object, or by > organisations like TI that verify all data provided by the IRT, before > inserting it in the RIPE database. > > Regards, > > Menno Pieters > > -- > Menno Pieters - Stelvio > Postbus 215, 3740 AE Baarn > phone: +31-35-5.429.324 / fax: +31-35-5.429.327 > XOIP: +31-84-8.720.349 / Web: http://www.stelvio.nl/ > >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]