This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] abuse-c

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rev Adrian Kennard a at k.gg
Fri Jan 9 12:26:04 CET 2004

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am new to this mailing list, so forgive me if this has been covered
before.

It seems there is a pretty clear need for an extra field in inetnum and
inet6num records, specifically something like an abuse-c field
referencing a person record.

A lot of inetnum records I have seen have a remarks field identifying
the abuse ocntact, but this is in an inconsistent format making it
difficult to automate in any way. It also seems that a lot of network
administrators (admin-c) do not feel they should administer their
network to remove viruses, etc, and get quite annoyed when contacted
regarding abuse.

What would be the procedure for proposing such a new field?

- --
Rev Adrian Kennard
uk.aa
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE//o/MHBb4e52L0Y0RAoPzAJ9Vp94eC6DMAPvAK7Lx5HiiVBPQSgCfTfFZ
HfzTEAB6TwmsFBbivTe4KaU=
=mlgj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]