This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

MarcoH marcoh at marcoh.net
Tue Feb 10 12:22:14 CET 2004

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:09:32PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>  >Adding abuse-mailbox would provide a clear way to to store this
>  >information, next step can be to change the whois server for an extra
>  >query type and/or modified output.
> While IRT objects *already* provide an easier way to store this
> information...

it contains a generic attribute called e-mail, a lot of companies use
different addresses for different parts of the work covered by IRT.

As an example, customer: "why is your dhcp server sending dhcp reasponses
to my machine" isn't really something I want our incident response team
aka security to be woken up for in the middle of the night.

MarcoH

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]