[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

MarcoH <mailto:marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[...]
> 
> To provide such a behaviour, we need to store the information somewhere in
> the database and free-form remarks or a more generic e-mail attribute is
> IMHO not the way.


I have been caught in a story of alledged spam with an end-user customer and
my experience is that ISP abuse team is at the crossroad between 
- lawyer (commercial and penal one), 
- wannabe hacker (coders with good programming skills and poor comprehension
of the universe ;)
- end-user customer that want bad guy punished and their mails delivered
(especially the unsollicited one they send),
- anti and pro spam lobby wich abhores one another
What I understood is abuse / IP problems are mostly resolved if you teach /
inform / communicate correctly.

As the situation is already quite confusing and complicated I definitively
want a Keep It Simple Stupid solution.
 
IMHO abuse-c: field wich is a valid email is Simple & Stutid (aka what I
need) : as a proof of concept I can successfully "sell" it today in my
company to the marketing department :) 


Regards,

Julien Tayon  9T 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040209/f0f30b31/attachment.html>