This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco d'Itri md at Linux.IT
Mon Feb 9 15:27:13 CET 2004

On Feb 09, Peter Koch <pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:

 >So, the problem is mainly a marketing/education problem. No matter what change
 >to objects or presentation will be agreed upon, nothing short of limiting
 >access to the database would stop the uneducatable or "let's hit them all"
 >type uncooperative tool writer. The education or usability problem can IMHO
 >best be achieved with a dedicated interface for "abuse" purposes, be it a
 >web interface or a dedicated whois server. No new objects are needed.
I fully agree with this. We should try to discuss how to make the
information in irt objects easier to access by random users.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [4512 pezk1XQLy8oBY]

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]