This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

MarcoH marcoh at marcoh.net
Sat Feb 7 17:04:35 CET 2004

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:33:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 06, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> 
>  >operators, as we're paying the bills and supposedly ncc is
>  >our service org.  and perhaps we should reward clue.
> My requirements as an operator[1] are already fulfilled by irt objects,
> can you explain better what are yours?

My requirements as an operator[2] are clearly not met, I get loads of
abuse complaints to my notify and changed addresses every week, which I
have to forward to either the abuse dept or /dev/null.

MarcoH

[2] operator as in maintaining our database entries which is part of
running an LIR

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]