[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

>Perhaps, but that's another discussion.
>Let's put that on the WIBNI list and stay focused.
>
>Niall
>
>On 6 Feb 2004, at 16:06, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> perhaps instead of adding another address they can call, we
>> should allow changed: and notify: to be nic-handles:.

  notify:, upd-to: and maybe one or too more are defined as email
  addresses.

  I don't see a good reason to get those changed. Both are used
  to manage successful or unsuccessful database updates.
  Different purpose.

  The changed is a sort of "weird" attribute anyway. It has been under
  discussion a few times, but no definite result as yet. AFAIK the NCC's
  hostmasters use it (the date part) for some sort of internal sanity
  checking of assignment transaction.

  I agree here: out of scope for this discussion.

  Wilfried.