This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Feb 6 16:09:06 CET 2004

Absolutely!  That was Ulrich's idea: once the person/role/mntner can 
carry
what we need, discard the more cumbersome irt object.

Niall

On 6 Feb 2004, at 14:33, Randy Bush wrote:

> why not remove irt entirely?  it is not needed given this proposal.
>
> "less is more."  -- mies van der rohe
>
> randy

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]