This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Beta release of Whois S/W with organisation object

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Wed Apr 14 17:14:30 CEST 2004

>To be sure, last meeting I had the count on the number of inet(6)num
>objects having a mnt-irt and the number having a remarks: *abuse*
>attribute.
>
>The request is to extend this on the actual number of IP-addresses covered
>by both methods ?

  Correct, 'cause the single entry you can obtain by asking for

> whois -h whois.ripe.net -cr 193.171.2.3

inetnum:      193.170.0.0 - 193.171.255.255
[ ... ]
status:       ALLOCATED UNSPECIFIED
mnt-by:       RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-lower:    ACONET-LIR-MNT
mnt-irt:      IRT-ACOnet-CERT
[ ... ]

  actually covers a /15 range...

> I will try to extend my script (grep | wc -l) a bit to
>get this info, hopefully during next weekend but at least in time for the
>next meeting.

  thanks!

>Grtx,
>
>MarcoH

  Wilfried.

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Beta release of Whois S/W with organisation object

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]