This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco d'Itri md at Linux.IT
Tue Apr 13 19:00:26 CEST 2004

On Apr 13, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote:

> Can you quantify what will still be required after taking advantage
> of the kind of aggregation you suggest ?
I think that a much better estimate is the number of ALLOCATED-BY-RIR
(for inet6num), ALLOCATED PA and ASSIGNED PI (for inetnum) objects.

After the top level objects will have a contact, detailed data can be
added by customers and the need for this will be regulated by the usual
ISP-customer relationships.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [5722 unFXozsm8iBp6]

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]