[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

On Apr 08, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> wrote:

> And what reasons are there to assume that the new proposal will
> be deployed all of a sudden?
I think it should be obvious that abuse-c and abuse-mailbox attributes
are much harder to deploy, because they require modifying every bottom
level inetnum/inetnum6 object (which may even be protected by the
mntner object of the customer).

I still think that the requirements for handling of abuse contacts have
not been discussed enough.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [5613 diD/o8PEXAukY]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040408/01621315/attachment.sig>