This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Thu Apr 8 11:17:56 CEST 2004
On Apr 07, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > The proposal from Randy and me is intended to offer a pragmatic, > lightweight, and easily deployed means to advertise abuse contacts. Even if I disagree I can see why some people think that abuse-mailbox is a good idea, but I still see no reason why abuse-c would be easier to deploy and to use than mnt-irt. Some people voiced objections over the mandatory use of encryption, but if perceived to be a problem this could be easily changed. What about trying to fix irt objects instead of complicating the database with multiple features with overlapping scope (irt, abuse-mailbox, abuse-c)? -- ciao, | Marco | [5612 qudenW7V5vzds]
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]