This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco d'Itri md at Linux.IT
Wed Apr 7 19:39:16 CEST 2004

On Apr 07, Engin Gunduz <engin at ripe.net> wrote:

> For "inetnum:"s and "inet6num:"s, would it make sense to
> put "abuse-c:" which will reference to a person/role object
> by NIC handle, thus removing the need to bulk-update the
> inet(6)num objects when the abuse mailbox changes?
What is the point? IRT records already work this way.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [5602 pr0Eh4bg9IRRQ]

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]