This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 7 19:03:18 CEST 2004

> We have RPSL-comments already (anything after a hash '#').  Would it
> make sense to use it rather than RFC-2622-comment?

an old lesson from language design.  do not put semantics into a
comment.

putting it in an rpsl comment says "this has absolutely no meaning"

putting it in an 2822 comment means this is about the 2822-addr-spec

randy

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]