This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure

Previous message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure
Next message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Tue Sep 9 10:50:52 CEST 2003

On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 18:57 Europe/Dublin, Randy Bush wrote:

> do you send the diagnostic output back to a compiler?

If you call auto-dbm a compiler! 8-)

One could use "###" instead of "***", and "#" instead of a blank
line to protect against the kind of failure mode Wilfried suggests.

Do ppl really correct (sic) and re-submit failure responses so
carelessly?

Seriously, though: it seems the developers have the "diagnostic
message" issue taken well on board.  The only detail I'm not too
clear about is the timescale.

Best,

Niall

Previous message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure
Next message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]