This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] "changed:" attribute [was: The New "organisation object" Proposal]
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: "changed:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Engin Gunduz
engin at ripe.net
Mon Sep 8 10:56:37 CEST 2003
Good morning, On 2003-09-06 11:49:59 +0200, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: > Hi *, > > >organisation: ORG-AA11-RIPE > >[...] > >org-type: LIR > >mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT > >mnt-ref: LIR-MNT > >mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT > > > >Here, we have "mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT" because RIPE NCC > >hostmaster will need to add references to this organisation > >object when creating/modifying allocation inetnums and aut-nums. > > Related to this Point from an experience I had this week: In this > context it would also be worth rethinking the behaviour of changed: Just FYI, In the past there has been some proposals and attempts to change the "changed:" attribute, like making it an auto-generated attribute, or getting rid of it altogether. However, they were all turned down, sometimes because the users have found another use of the attribute beyond the intended use, and sometimes because of privacy issues. As it stands now, "changed:" attributes can be deleted/added to objects on demand, with a few restrictions. However, the user is not forced by the whois software to add a new "changed:" attribute when it is modified. Thus, the last "changed:" attribute may not actually reflect the date it has been last changed. This is misleading. Secondly, the query users do not really know what "changed:" attribute means. Normally the e-mail box in these attributes specify who performed the changes to the objects, and they are not necessarily responsible for the resources that the objects represent. For example, the email addresses in the "changed:" attributes of an inetnum object are not necessarily the email addresses of the network administrator, so they should not be used to report abuse. However most users and automated tools pick anything that resembles an email address in the whois query result and send them abuse complaints. Regards, > I wanted to add a mnt-irt to our inet6num, so I added that line to the > object, signed it and sent it tothe mostmasters. Ingrid came back to me > with the request to add the appropriate changed-line, to reflect the > changed line and resign/submit it. > > I have no idea for a solution (apart from documenting the fact somewhere). > > lG uk > -- > Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien > Network/Security Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, Austria > > eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 > Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140 -- Engin Gunduz RIPE NCC Database Group
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: "changed:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]