[db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal

Shane Kerr wrote:
> On 2003-09-04 09:22:56 +0200, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>One thing (too early to think about all at once)
>>
>>
>>>If we agree on this more generic solution, we could extend this
>>>behavior to other Objects that can be referenced as well.
>>>e.g. for mntner: itself. this would be a way tho prevent anyone
>>
>>>from putting my mntner ont oan object. (This would solve the issue
>>
>>>discussed in the context of the IRT Object - where the mntner of
>>>the object should be a proof of authenticity as well)
>>
>>This idea is good by means of consistency, BUT it would be weaker
>>than the auth: in the IRT, because there are only PGP keys allowed,
>>whereas in a mntner anything is possible.
> 
> 
> Actually, you can use any "auth:" type in the IRT (even NONE!!!).  But
> don't do that.  :-/

`,:-] hmm interesting, well then, it mnt-ref and auth are of the same 
quality in irt as well.

lG uk, who slowly starts to wake up :-)
-- 
Ulrich Kiermayr         Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien
Network/Security              Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, Austria

eMail:   ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at          Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104
                                                Fax: (+43 1) 4277 /  9140