This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Oct 30 22:51:20 CET 2003
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Thor Kottelin wrote: I would like to see mandatory email and maybe even a once yearly auto-check to see that the email is still valid. -Hank > Folks, > > Email is the preferred communication medium when troubleshooting > internetworking problems. Time and time again, "inetnum" objects with no > valid email address cause grief. In the absence of relevant "e-mail" > attributes, desperate administrators sometimes send mail to addresses found > in "changed" and "notify" attributes. Sometimes the only option left is > resorting to telephone calls, regardless of the expenses, time differences > and language barriers often involved. > > I would therefore liketo suggest making the "e-mail" attribute mandatory > for the "person" object. If this isn't acceptable, then maybe at least one > of the "person" or "role" objects referred to by an "inetnum" object should > carry an "e-mail" attribute. Additionally, in order to enhance address > validity, I would like to suggest performing some kind of validation on > these "e-mail" attribute values - perhaps simple syntax checking, or maybe > even full round-trip SMTP testing, or something in between. > > Your comments, please. > > Thor > > -- > http://thorweb.anta.net/ > Hank Nussbacher
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]