This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "p erson" object?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Titley, Nigel
NTitley at flagtelecom.com
Mon Nov 3 12:47:13 CET 2003
Thor Kottelin wrote: > Folks, > > Email is the preferred communication medium when troubleshooting > internetworking problems. Time and time again, "inetnum" > objects with no > valid email address cause grief. In the absence of relevant "e-mail" > attributes, desperate administrators sometimes send mail to > addresses found > in "changed" and "notify" attributes. Sometimes the only > option left is > resorting to telephone calls, regardless of the expenses, > time differences > and language barriers often involved. The argument against making the email attribute mandatory has always been the bootstrapping problem... In the olden days (defined by my children as "when Daddy was young") it was genuinely possible for a person in the RIPE database to not actually have an email address during the setting up phase of a LIR. I would however agree with Thor, that this circumstance no longer exists. Anyone can get a temporary email address, hotmail via the local cybercafe, if nothing else, to tide them over the bootstrapping period. > > I would therefore like to suggest making the "e-mail" > attribute mandatory > for the "person" object. If this isn't acceptable, then maybe > at least one > of the "person" or "role" objects referred to by an "inetnum" > object should > carry an "e-mail" attribute. Additionally, in order to enhance address > validity, I would like to suggest performing some kind of > validation on > these "e-mail" attribute values - perhaps simple syntax > checking, or maybe > even full round-trip SMTP testing, or something in between. > > Your comments, please. > > Thor ********************************************************************** This e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and contains information which is or may be confidential, non-public or legally privileged. Any dissemination or distribution of this message other than to its intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us by email to postmaster at flagtelecom.com immediately and delete the original message and all copies from all locations in your computer systems. This e-mail has been swept by Mailsweeper TM for viruses. However, FLAG Telecom cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses. **********************************************************************
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]