This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Proposed change 2003.3: "reclaim:"-like functionality
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.3: "reclaim:"-like functionality
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.3: "reclaim:"-like functionality
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Mar 4 16:04:19 CET 2003
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> Any maintainer that would have been able to authorise the creation of
> an object can authorise the deletion of the same object.
>
> If creation of an object requires authorisation from multiple
> maintainers (e.g. route objects that require authorisation from an
> aut-num and an inetnum), then any of those maintainers may authorise
> the deletion.
I like this. It gives reclaim: functionality without having to add all
the additional code & checks.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57021 (57147)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.3: "reclaim:"-like functionality
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.3: "reclaim:"-like functionality
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]