This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Larisa A. Yurkina
ula at ripn.net
Fri Aug 29 11:32:07 CEST 2003
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Engin Gunduz wrote: > On 2003-08-29 09:59:43 +0200, azucena.hernandezperez at telefonica.es wrote: > > I support the view of Hans Petter regarding the additional identification > > of each organisation by a number making it a separate object in the > > The org-ID in the "organisation:" attribute will already make it a > separate object. The org-ID is unique. Also, it will not change > even when the name of the organisation changes. > > > database. I am in favor using the VAT number for organisations in EU > > countries and soon in the Eastern Europe Accessing countries and any other > > national registration number for those organisations established in non-EU > > countries. > > The problem I see here is: This number will mean very little to the whois users > outside the EU. If somebody puts any kind of number which is meaningful > only in the organisation's country, then an explanation of what that number > is, and how it can be used, must be put in a "remarks:" attribute. Thus > a "remarks:" attribute is already required?? In Russia we already use unique VAT numbers in the domain names db which includes "organisation:" objects. In case it is also used in the RIPE db we'll have double option to easily find ips if there are any. > > > Azucena > > > > > > > > > I think that this is something too specific to have its own attribute. > > > > "remarks:" attribute can be used for this I guess, just like it can > > > > be used to point users to web pages etc. > > > > > > I dont agree: the point about the attribute would be to uniquely identify > > > the organisation within a country. I am quite shure all countries within > > > the EU has this concept of org-number/vat number or public registry > > > number. The good thing is that it stays unique and lives trough name > > > changes. > > See above. > > > > > > > Hans Petter > > Best regards, > -- > Engin Gunduz > RIPE NCC Database Group > With respect, Larisa Yurkina --- RIPN Registry center -----
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]