This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Lahtinen
md at ncuk.net
Fri Aug 29 10:10:56 CEST 2003
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 azucena.hernandezperez at telefonica.es wrote: > I support the view of Hans Petter regarding the additional > identification of each organisation by a number making it a separate > object in the database. I am in favor using the VAT number for > organisations in EU countries and soon in the Eastern Europe Accessing > countries and any other national registration number for those > organisations established in non-EU countries. Not all UK businesses are VAT registered. Also, businesses can be unincorporated, sole traders, etc. so they won't necessarily have "company numbers" either. Attempting to number them using any generic criteria won't work. If you want to do this, you'll have to complicate the database/criteria significantly. Sebastien. --- NetConnex Broadband Ltd. tel. +44 870 745 4830 fax. +44 870 745 4831 Court Farm Lodge, 1 Eastway, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8SG. United Kingdom.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]