This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal

Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Emma Apted emma.apted at psineteurope.com
Fri Aug 29 10:43:36 CEST 2003

At 08:57 29/08/2003, Rob Blokzijl wrote:
> >> I am quite shure all countries within
> >> the EU has this concept of org-number/vat number or public registry
> >> number.
> > Idon't agree. Probably it is tru for the 15 EU countries. Wether it is
> > true for the 91 countries in the RIPE NCC region - I don't know.

In that case, we could leave the field as [optional], so those 
organisations in countries with such a system can use them and the others 
don't need to.

Best regards,

Emma Apted
Peering Co-ordinator, Engineering & Standards
PSINet Europe

Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]