This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] ERX of v4 address space proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] ERX of v4 address space proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] ERX of v4 address space proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hpholen at tiscali.no
Tue Nov 12 23:52:07 CET 2002
--On 5. november 2002 10:00 +0100 Berislav Todorovic <beri at eurorings.net> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > >>> Please find attached the proposal for the ERX of IPv4 address space for >>> your review. > > Most legacy IPv4 address space was assigned directly by InterNIC. Should > we read that all those addresses will have "PI" status? > > Secondly, who will provide reverse delegation and how can users of these > blocks affect reverse delegation changes? I guess auto-inaddr will not > work since it requires a valid RegID. I see three possibilities: 1) If you are already a LIR, this is no problem 2) If you are not an LIR, you probably receive connectivity from someone who are, and they should be able to help you out on this. 3) You may choose to become an LIR -hph
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] ERX of v4 address space proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [lir-wg] ERX of v4 address space proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]