This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
MD5 proposal
- Previous message (by thread): MD5 proposal
- Next message (by thread): MD5 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
mc
m.candanpolat at chello.nl
Fri Mar 29 20:20:59 CET 2002
----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: "Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei at ripe.net>; "Olafur Osvaldsson" <oli at isnic.is>; <db-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:31 PM Subject: Re: MD5 proposal > >> My main concern here would be that basing the proposed method on an > >> implementation (md5-crypt), which may change or may be mixed with some > >> other implementation, rather than on the documented algorithm (md5 > >> hash), which cannot, may cause confusion in the future. > >> And, as a side question from a person far from cryptography, is it a > >> proved fact that iterative complexity of md5-crypt makes the hash better? > > It makes dictionary attacks harder and more timeconsuming, it also > > makes it harder to do hardware implementations because you need > > many times more hardware. > > the way out of this would seem to be for someone to write an internet draft > on salted md5 and process it through the ietf security area. > > randy
- Previous message (by thread): MD5 proposal
- Next message (by thread): MD5 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]