This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
NRTM proposal
- Previous message (by thread): NRTM proposal
- Next message (by thread): NRTM proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
andrei at ripe.net
Mon Mar 11 17:00:01 CET 2002
Hi Ping, Lu, Ping wrote: > Since we are talking about NRTM, I would like to raise a question on how to > filter out > some objects for privacy or other reasons. > > 1. There are two different cases: NRTM ingress( client mirroring from > server) and > NRTM egress ( server mirroring into client ) > > 2. For NRTM egress: Usually want to filter out PERSON object for privacy. > > 3. For NRTM ingress: Sometime other RR may have polluted route objects or > other non-standard RPSL extension. > > 4. Other than modified the server we can put a wrapper to filter out > unwanted object then send a dummy object to the server. > > 5. The problem is how do you specify action ? Because you can not ADD or DEL > twice the same dummy object. So the wrapper have to TRACK the action > sequence. This is problematic and sometimes won't work at all. > In fact, with both RIPEv3 and iRRd you can ADD twice (or rather many times in a row), as this is considered as an update. So in our setup we use the approach you decribed below, but with "ADD" action. We put a mirror reflector in front of all mirrored sources, and every time it sees a non-compliant object mirror reflector substitutes it with "ADD + dummy object" without losing track of serials. > 6. The solution I am proposed is: a DUMMY action for both NRTM ingress and > egress. Whenever there is a need to filter some objects, the server will > send a dummy object with DUMMY action. Then the NRTM client will accept the > DUMMY/dummy stream and increase the serial number without any real action. > > Any comment ? > > > Ping Lu > Cable & Wireless USA > Network Tools and Analysis Group > W: +1-703-292-2359 > E: plu at cw.net > > Regards, Andrei Robachevsky RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): NRTM proposal
- Next message (by thread): NRTM proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]