NRTM proposal

"Lu, Ping" wrote:
> 
> Since we are talking about NRTM, I would like to raise a question on how to
> filter out
> some objects for privacy or other reasons.

[deleted]
 
> Any comment ?

How about setting up an instance for private objects and one with
standard-objetcs.
Let the one with the private objects synchronize with the standard one
(i.e. per e-mail-script)

Only standard objects gets exported to the standard-objects DB. Then let
others mirror
only the instance with the standard objects.

This has also the advantage you dont mix ip-management only data with
routing-registry
relevant data. As you might know Cable&Wireless Europe has modified
version of
the RIPE-DB running which contains only IP-Management data but no route
objetcs etc.

This isnt an ideal solution but it works. The right solution would be to
establish
distributed route registries and not to mirror each other. 

There is already a RFC out which describes how distributed registries
could work
but i cant find it at the moment, sorry. (Anyone know which RFC it is?)

regards,

  Arnd