This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 13 12:14:03 CEST 2002
Hi, On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: > DELEGATED-TO-NSP and ASSIGNED-TO-USER are two terms that would be clear > worldwide. A LIR is something different from "just a network service provider". Actually, a LIR is pretty well-defined (as is RIR), and maybe some effort should be invested to use *that* terminology world-wide, instead of inventing new terms for everything to completely confuse matters. Ditto for ALLOCATED and ASSIGNED - renaming those doesn't really solve anything (and overlooks the multi-hierarchy problem Robert has already mentioned). We would need at least "DELEGATED-TO-LIR", "SUB-DELEGATED", and "ASSIGNED-TO-USER", but again I see no significant improvement as compared to (well-documented) "ALLOCATED", "SUB-ALLOCATED" and "ASSIGNED" values. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 46204 (45201) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]