This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michel Py michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Wed Jun 12 05:12:02 CEST 2002

> Anne Lord wrote:
> There is no PI in IPv6.
> This can't be said often enough.

We are working on two new types of v6 addresses that are neither PA nor
PI for multihoming. Please keep in mind that PA does not provide enough
functionality; if no multihoming protocol is released in a timely manner
you will inevitably have PI, or whatever you want to call everyone
becoming a LIR.

Michel.

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]