This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Karrenberg Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Jun 12 09:11:55 CEST 2002

At 06:00 AM 6/12/2002, Geoff Huston wrote:
>However, the distinction between "ALLOCATED" and "ASSIGNED" is perhaps a bit subtle.

When these attributes were created, those particular words were in deemed both descriptive and clear.
Maybe the language concerned has shifted underneath in the meantime ;-).
As a native speaker of one of its dialects, would you make a suggestion for improvement?

Daniel 

• Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
• Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]