This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
sub-allocations or something similar
- Previous message (by thread): Non-unique nic-hdl in RIPE database
- Next message (by thread): sub-allocations or something similar
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Morozovsky
marck at rinet.ru
Wed Jul 18 12:57:48 CEST 2001
Hello there colleagues, for some last years I'm working with RIPE DB I think it would be useful to have some kind of "sub-allocation" inetnum objects. Brief example in our current situation: there is downstream provider behind us, currently without its own address block, so I've assigned /21 for them. All that space was of course well-documented, with ripe-141's covering all the nets, and appropriate inetnum objects have been created. But, for aggregating purposes, I suppose aggregating inetnum for the whole /21 would be useful and self-documenting. I can create such object, but such object is considered as overlapped. I think about explicit route-object also, but size behind current minimum allocation size (/19 for 195/8 or /20 for newer) somewhat stops me :) Your (both community and especially RIPE NCC people) suggestions are strongly expected ;-) Thank you. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): Non-unique nic-hdl in RIPE database
- Next message (by thread): sub-allocations or something similar
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]