This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Removal of selected sets of contact information from the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): Removal of selected sets of contact information from the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): Removal of selected sets of contact information from the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Wed Aug 22 07:02:59 CEST 2001
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: Some objects you may find were added 10 years ago when there was no rule for a maintainer for person objects. These objects may still be valid and referenced. I wonder how many people here remember dfk at cwi.nl in changed tags from 1990? :-) You are right that you need to protect against spammers. And yes, you want to split the 2.8M deletions into something of value. How about taking the last few "changed" tags, eliminate those with ripe.net references, and then create individual files with the objects deleted sorted by the change tag info. Protect them by user/pswd and send it only to the person listed in the changed tag. -Hank > Dear Hank, > > I can think of a couple of reasons for requesting this but bear in mind: > > -We are talking about the deletion of around 2.8 million objects > -The only potential link between a person and a country is the address > field, which does not necessarily contain a country > - Exposing such a list would make a spammers dream. We have tried to > protect personal information in the RIPE Database by preventing buld > download of personal information and controlling the rate of queries. If > we now expose a list of all this information we will doing precisely what > we want to avoid > > Could you put forward some arguments for having this data exposed so we > can all weight pros and cons? > > Thanks, > Joao Damas > RIPE NCC > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: > > > > Can a list of "to be deleted" objects per country be posted or if not, how > > about after the fact, as to which objects have been deleted per country? > > > > Thanks, > > Hank > Hank Nussbacher
- Previous message (by thread): Removal of selected sets of contact information from the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): Removal of selected sets of contact information from the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]