This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Privacy, Broadband, & the Database
- Previous message (by thread): Privacy, Broadband, & the Database
- Next message (by thread): Privacy, Broadband, & the Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex French
afrench at vianetworks.com
Wed Nov 29 16:53:10 CET 2000
At 12:25 PM 29/11/2000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: >=The same rule should apply to all assignments. If a (home) network >=contact person doesn't want to be 'listed', s/he can try to live >=without real network and buy NAT from a provider. > > That's a very valid point. I don't agree. There should not have to be a tradeoff between IP address and privacy... you should not be forced to use NAT simply to protect your phone number. I think that the original solution of listing the provider is a good real-world workaround. -- Alex French Consultant, Technical Services E: afrench at vianetworks.com VIA NET.WORKS, Inc. T: +353 86 818 8118
- Previous message (by thread): Privacy, Broadband, & the Database
- Next message (by thread): Privacy, Broadband, & the Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]