This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Deletion of German domains
- Previous message (by thread): Deletion of German domains
- Next message (by thread): Deletion of German domains
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Jun 27 18:31:20 CEST 2000
> You are right, we are moving only domain objects. The person objects > will remain in the RIPE Database for several months. and how will person:s work? in general, i am confused about this. e.g. whois -h whois.ripe.net dom.ain causes a referral to a domain: object with a tech-c: of <handle>-RIPE, or is it <handle>-DENIC? if the former, <handle>-RIPE then it would seem that either o all the person:s stay at ripe database, or o the person:s are mirrored from denic database to ripe database if the latter, <handle>-DENIC, then it would seem that either o all the person:s are mirrored in the ripe database, or o the above whois query will not be able to show the requestor the person:s in general there is a problem of duplication (or lack thereof as ripe seems uninclined to mirror any data except radb and apnic) as oposed to referral for handles. i am trying to understand the best practice we can muster now and what we might do in the future. for the curious, i run the RGNET database at whois.rg.net. the purpose is twofold, referree for some cctlds and my routing data. radb mirrors these data but ripe does not. i am confused whether i am rb366 or rb366-arin, and in how many databases i need to maintain the person:s. randy
- Previous message (by thread): Deletion of German domains
- Next message (by thread): Deletion of German domains
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]