This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

New object

Previous message (by thread): New object
Next message (by thread): a few matters about security and consistency

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rimas Janusauskas Rimas.Janusauskas at sc.vu.lt
Mon Jul 10 18:24:36 CEST 2000

On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Rimas Janusauskas wrote:
> 
> [skip]
> RJ> 2. If accept your proposal, "organization" attribute with unique handle
> RJ> like person/role MUST substitute inetnum(s), which became
> RJ>      [mandatory]  [multiple]     [look-up key]            
> RJ> attribute? I'm not sure that RIPE community is ready for such significant
> RJ> changes...
> 
> I'm very much surprized by 'multiple' status of proposed attribute. How
> can netblock belong to more than one company (provided they are in
> compliance with RIPE-185) ? Yes, there is also some possible problems with
> either renaming (e.g., by splitting/merging) organization or other ways of
> changing the "owner" of netblock.

Mea cuppa! of course, it should be read 2. <...> "organization" object.

Rimas

Previous message (by thread): New object
Next message (by thread): a few matters about security and consistency

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]