This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
New object
- Previous message (by thread): New object
- Next message (by thread): New object
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen Burley
stephenb at uk.uu.net
Mon Jul 10 11:17:09 CEST 2000
Rimas Janusauskas wrote: > Hi, > > IMHO, this is the same feature as "netname:" attribute should do. > Even netname has "user unfriendly" format and possibility assign same > ID to different organizations. > Maybe the problem could be solved by adding new attribute to inetnum: > object? OK i understand what you are saying here but the problem is the network does not exist until it is assigned or is approved meaning if a customer comes to use for more space without admitting to the fact they already have space, an engineer not aware of previous assignments make a further assignemt under a differant netname. I agree the netname could be used for this feature but how do you find all the address space assigned to a customer by netname alone. If there was a way to tag a netname/inetnum with a customer unique handle ie comapny nic, then an engineer can trace all IP ranges attatched to that company, and can even find the correct customer nic by searching for the company name. I know there would be the same inherrant problems with keeping it up to date, but i think it would be better than nothing. Nice to hear the DB group is thinking ahead Joao ;) Ragards, > > > Best regards, > > Rimas Janusauskas, > Vilnius University Hostmaster > ______________________________________________________________________ > > P.O.Box 543 e-mail: rimas.janusauskas at sc.vu.lt > LT-2024 Vilnius > Lithuania fax/phone: +370 2 687188 > ______________________________________________________________________ > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > yes, we called it the "organization" object. We decided to postpone > > bringing it up for a little while, to make sure the reimplementation would > > be closer to the end and it could be incorporated within a reasonable > > time. > > > > This would be during the next RIPE meeting (September). > > > > We can release it (I can't access it right now) as a starting > > point for discussion. > > > > Is that OK? > > > > Joao > > > > > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Stephen Burley wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > I have a quick question has any ever thought of creating a company > > > object, which is much the same as a person object but it means that any > > > range of IP's assigned to a company will easily be traced. Making it > > > easier to find the total amount IP space assigned to a company/org , > > > which frankly at the moment is impossable. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Stephen Burley "If patience is a virtue, and ignorance is bliss, > > > UUNET EMEA Hostmaster you can have a pretty good life > > > Stephenb at uk.uu.net if you're stupid and willing to wait" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stephen Burley "If patience is a virtue, and ignorance is bliss, UUNET EMEA Hostmaster you can have a pretty good life [SB855-RIPE] if you're stupid and willing to wait" ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): New object
- Next message (by thread): New object
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]